Search | Forums | Classifieds (68) | Skins | Language |
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posted 5/13/2021 06:18 (#9002683) Subject: 2-4d vs enlist |
West Central Wisconsin
Posted 5/13/2021 06:57 (#9002749 - in reply to #9002683) Subject: RE: 2-4d vs enlist |
Posted 5/13/2021 07:29 (#9002845 - in reply to #9002683) Subject: RE: 2-4d vs enlist |
EC WI
Posted 5/13/2021 07:45 (#9002874 - in reply to #9002683) Subject: RE: 2-4d vs enlist |
N MO
Posted 5/13/2021 07:51 (#9002891 - in reply to #9002845) Subject: RE: 2-4d vs enlist |
Northeast Indiana
Posted 5/13/2021 07:55 (#9002901 - in reply to #9002845) Subject: RE: 2-4d vs enlist |
West Central Wisconsin
Posted 5/13/2021 08:17 (#9002954 - in reply to #9002901) Subject: RE: 2-4d vs enlist |
Northeast Indiana
Posted 5/13/2021 09:11 (#9003055 - in reply to #9002683) Subject: RE: 2-4d vs enlist |
King City, Mo
Enlist 1 was around $44 in 2.5’s
So it adds a lot of fat to their pocket
Posted 5/13/2021 11:20 (#9003244 - in reply to #9002891) Subject: RE: 2-4d vs enlist |
St George IL
Posted 5/13/2021 12:11 (#9003318 - in reply to #9003244) Subject: RE: 2-4d vs enlist |
Northeast Indiana
Edit: Even then I'm pretty sure the technology agreement says to only use Enlist 2-4D with Enlist soybeans.
Edited by Bhrfarms 5/13/2021 12:12
Posted 5/13/2021 12:16 (#9003327 - in reply to #9003244) Subject: RE: 2-4d vs enlist |
Northeast Indiana
Enlist E3™ soybeans contain the patented gene that provides tolerance to 2,4-D choline, glyphosate and
glufosinate herbicides.
Following burndown, Enlist Duo™ with Colex-D™ technology is the only herbicide containing 2,4-D that is labeled
for pre-emergence and post-emergence use with Enlist E3 soybeans.
Growers are NOT authorized to:
• Use 2,4-D products without Colex-D Technology in conjunction with Enlist™ crops
• Following burndown, use any phenoxy auxin herbicide-containing product (e.g., containing 2,4-D, 2,4-DB,
MCPA, dichlorprop, LV6, MCPB, mecoprop) which is NOT expressly labeled for use in conjunction with Enlist crops,
including pre-emergent use
• Following burndown, use any pyridine auxin herbicides (e.g., triclopyr, fluroxypyr) on emerged Enlist™ Crops
• Apply any dicamba herbicide to Enlist E3 soybeans. Enlist E3 soybeans are not tolerant to dicamba, and severe crop
injury will occur.
Posted 5/13/2021 13:00 (#9003390 - in reply to #9002891) Subject: RE: 2-4d vs enlist |
Bhrfarms - 5/13/2021 07:51
Enlist is labeled for burndown/pre emergence in both corn and beans. For enlist soybeans, you must use enlist as a burndown instead of ester or amine if you want to be on label. Another fact about enlist that most people don't know, enlist one is labeled for burndown in non enlist corn without a plant back window.
I wonder about crop safety with enlist one preemergence on corn. Like you said, it is labeled, but does that make it a good idea?
Tried on a few acres “here”, should know the results soon.
Posted 5/13/2021 14:35 (#9003510 - in reply to #9003390) Subject: RE: 2-4d vs enlist |
Northeast Indiana
Posted 5/13/2021 18:37 (#9003733 - in reply to #9003055) Subject: RE: 2-4d vs enlist |
Northern Ohio Grain
lawfarms - 5/13/2021 10:11
LV6 was around $17 in 2.5’s
Enlist 1 was around $44 in 2.5’s
So it adds a lot of fat to their pocket
And to add to your figures LV6 is 6 lb and Enlist is only 4 lb so the difference is even worse.
Posted 5/13/2021 18:39 (#9003735 - in reply to #9002874) Subject: RE: 2-4d vs enlist |
Northern Ohio Grain
6030Deere - 5/13/2021 08:45
Enlist is 24d choline and has very little to no smell and will not volatize and move off target.
NOT is a strong word.
(enlist (full).png)
(enlist2 (full).png)
Attachments
----------------
enlist (full).png (35KB - 147 downloads)
enlist2 (full).png (28KB - 147 downloads)
Posted 5/13/2021 21:26 (#9003993 - in reply to #9003055) Subject: RE: 2-4d vs enlist |
EC IL
Adds a lot of value.
Posted 5/13/2021 22:13 (#9004110 - in reply to #9003735) Subject: RE: 2-4d vs enlist |
OK Panhandle
Posted 5/14/2021 05:23 (#9004273 - in reply to #9004110) Subject: RE: 2-4d vs enlist |
Northern Ohio Grain
Kit - 5/13/2021 23:13
Do you have any context for these graphs, especially the bottom one? What study are they from?
https://tobacco.ces.ncsu.edu/2017/04/from-the-field-agronomy-notes-v...
Posted 5/14/2021 06:32 (#9004328 - in reply to #9002874) Subject: RE: 2-4d vs enlist |
northwest Missouri
Posted 5/14/2021 06:42 (#9004353 - in reply to #9003327) Subject: RE: 2-4d vs enlist |
southern MN
A normal burn down could be an old 24d and wait 7 days.
Paul
Posted 5/14/2021 07:28 (#9004452 - in reply to #9003993) Subject: RE: 2-4d vs enlist |
King City, Mo
Posted 5/14/2021 12:04 (#9004866 - in reply to #9004452) Subject: RE: 2-4d vs enlist |
Central Texas
Posted 5/14/2021 20:14 (#9005450 - in reply to #9004452) Subject: RE: 2-4d vs enlist |
EC IL
Posted 5/15/2021 08:18 (#9006007 - in reply to #9004866) Subject: RE: 2-4d vs enlist |
South Central Kansas, Harper County
blacklander - 5/14/2021 12:04
Be glad you don't have cotton nearby, you would have seen how it can move.